Showing posts with label node. Show all posts
Showing posts with label node. Show all posts

Friday, March 9, 2012

Removing Nodes from a Virtual Server?

I've build a SQL 2000 SP3a cluster on top of an 8 node Windows 2003 cluster.
We've decided to split the cluster up into 2 individual clusters and as such
I'm attempting to remove some of the cluster nodes from the Virtual Server
Definiton (as per the "Adding or Removing a Cluster Node from the Vritual
Server Definition" of
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...clus.mspx#EGAA)
Anyway, I begin the SQL install and get to the Computer Name dialog where I
choose the virtual server name. I click next and the install GUI just
disapears. I check and setupsql.exe is continues to show up as running in
Taskman for about 10 minutes then just finishes up.
Any thoughts?
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
"Chris B." wrote:

> I've build a SQL 2000 SP3a cluster on top of an 8 node Windows 2003 cluster.
> We've decided to split the cluster up into 2 individual clusters and as such
> I'm attempting to remove some of the cluster nodes from the Virtual Server
> Definiton (as per the "Adding or Removing a Cluster Node from the Vritual
> Server Definition" of
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...clus.mspx#EGAA)
> Anyway, I begin the SQL install and get to the Computer Name dialog where I
> choose the virtual server name. I click next and the install GUI just
> disapears. I check and setupsql.exe is continues to show up as running in
> Taskman for about 10 minutes then just finishes up.
> Any thoughts?
|||Hi
Only 4 Nodes are supported on a cluster by SQL Server 2000. It is a setup UI
limitation.
You need to remove the installation like you installed it, with command
line.
Regards
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"Chris" <Chris@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:981588B6-717B-45C2-BBBA-F5C30A2AE5F2@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Anyone have any thoughts on this?
> "Chris B." wrote:
|||Hmm, thanks for the quick reply.
I don't believe I installed from a command line, but those few weeks were
pretty crazy Can you point me in the general direction of documentation
on the command line syntax? I assume you're talking about using the
sqlrem.bat file?
"Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" wrote:

> Hi
> Only 4 Nodes are supported on a cluster by SQL Server 2000. It is a setup UI
> limitation.
> You need to remove the installation like you installed it, with command
> line.
> Regards
> --
> Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> Zurich, Switzerland
> IM: mike@.epprecht.net
> MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
> Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
> "Chris" <Chris@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:981588B6-717B-45C2-BBBA-F5C30A2AE5F2@.microsoft.com...
>
>
|||I have not seen any. It was in a discussion with a developer from the SQL
Server Development Team.
PSS might be able to help.
Regards
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"Chris" <Chris@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:22265BEA-AD19-4C06-BFE6-146D419CCE10@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hmm, thanks for the quick reply.
> I don't believe I installed from a command line, but those few weeks were
> pretty crazy Can you point me in the general direction of
> documentation
> on the command line syntax? I assume you're talking about using the
> sqlrem.bat file?
> "Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" wrote:

Saturday, February 25, 2012

Removing Duplicate Entries from a Parent-Child Hierarchy

I have defined a Parent-Child hierarchy for one of my dimensions. (It is a flavour of organisation structure)

However, when I process it, each node repeats itself as one of its own children.

What is going on here and how can I fix this? Someone mentioned a property I can set, but nothing jumps out at me.

It's the datamember, no? If you drag and drop theses members for a MDX query it brings the .datamember in the end of the member? If so, just set to hidden the datamember.

The parent-child attribute has a property named "MemberWithData" set to "NonLeafDataHidden".

|||

Handerson is right.

You have the change the default property to get the desired effect.

The default scenario which AS2005 is where a sales mgr and his salesmen all sell products and you wnat to display revenue for them.

The alternative might be that only the salesmen sell and the manager does not have any sales, Then you ahve to reconfigure the property defined above.

|||

I don't understand what you guys are talking about... when I browse the hierarchy of my parent child relationship, for each parent node there is a child node with the same name and properties when the dimension is processed. This is before we even run any MDX...

|||

Let's look a sample, if you have the parent-child dimension entity like that:

America|||Thanks for the clarification ... much appreciated.

Removing Cluster node

I want to remove a node from my SQL Server Cluster using Add/Remove
Programs. the SQL resource is on the node that is remaining. Question:
When I do the actual removal of the node, will SQL stay on line on the other
node, or does it go offline for a short period of time?
Thanks!
Why?
What version of Windows? 2000? 20003? 2000 uses Add/remove for the service,
2003 does not anymore.
In either case use Cluster Administrator to evict the node from the cluster.
Cheers,
Rodney R. Fournier
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
"Steve" <Steve.sam@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:O2bgTM5eHHA.1312@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>I want to remove a node from my SQL Server Cluster using Add/Remove
>Programs. the SQL resource is on the node that is remaining. Question:
>When I do the actual removal of the node, will SQL stay on line on the
>other node, or does it go offline for a short period of time?
> Thanks!
>
|||We're on Windows 2003 Enterprise 64 bit
I'm just interested in the SQL part right now. I'm using SQL 2005 Standard.
When SQL is on one of the nodes, I'm experiencing all kinds of problems and
have been unable to resolve the issue so I'm just going to get rid of that
node and build a new one. I know I need to evict the node from Windows
Clustering, but I also want to remove the node from the SQL cluster in the
proper way, which I believe to be through add/remove programs and selecting
the instance of SQL to change. But what I wanted to know was if there is
downtime involved in removing the node from the SQL Cluster (i.e. SQL
Virtual Server)
Thanks!
"Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@.die.spam.die.nw-america.com> wrote in
message news:etOxiR5eHHA.4772@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Why?
> What version of Windows? 2000? 20003? 2000 uses Add/remove for the
> service, 2003 does not anymore.
> In either case use Cluster Administrator to evict the node from the
> cluster.
> Cheers,
> Rodney R. Fournier
> MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
> http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
> http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
> http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
> ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
>
> "Steve" <Steve.sam@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:O2bgTM5eHHA.1312@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>
|||"Steve" <Steve.sam@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e9MVkY5eHHA.2052@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> We're on Windows 2003 Enterprise 64 bit
> I'm just interested in the SQL part right now. I'm using SQL 2005
> Standard. When SQL is on one of the nodes, I'm experiencing all kinds of
> problems and have been unable to resolve the issue so I'm just going to
> get rid of that node and build a new one. I know I need to evict the node
> from Windows Clustering, but I also want to remove the node from the SQL
> cluster in the proper way, which I believe to be through add/remove
> programs and selecting the instance of SQL to change. But what I wanted
> to know was if there is downtime involved in removing the node from the
> SQL Cluster (i.e. SQL Virtual Server)
> Thanks!
>
> "Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@.die.spam.die.nw-america.com> wrote in
> message news:etOxiR5eHHA.4772@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>
>
You would use add/remove pgms to destroy the whole SQL Server install, not
just one node.
Cluster Administrator is your friend.

Monday, February 20, 2012

Removing a Team

If I have a teamed adapter in a cluster, shouldn't I be able to remove that
node from the cluster, break the team and re-add the node? It seems to fail
whenever I try to add the node back, with the team broken.
As long as the IP is within the same subnet, this should not be a problem.
What happens? Are you getting an error? Are you trying to us the same IP
that the team had or a different one? Same subnet?
Cheers,
Rod
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
"Kevin Antel" <kevina@.cqlcorp.com> wrote in message
news:%23NdrMQqIGHA.528@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> If I have a teamed adapter in a cluster, shouldn't I be able to remove
> that node from the cluster, break the team and re-add the node? It seems
> to fail whenever I try to add the node back, with the team broken.
>
|||Yes, I get an error during validation. Yes, I am trying to use the same IP
that I used with the team. I am in the middle of support right now, but as
soon as I can get the error, I will throw it up here.
"Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@.die.spam.die.nw-america.com> wrote in
message news:%23uiXoaqIGHA.3020@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> As long as the IP is within the same subnet, this should not be a problem.
> What happens? Are you getting an error? Are you trying to us the same IP
> that the team had or a different one? Same subnet?
> Cheers,
> Rod
> MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
> http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
> http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
> http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
> "Kevin Antel" <kevina@.cqlcorp.com> wrote in message
> news:%23NdrMQqIGHA.528@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
|||Great, thanks. What driver? NIC model?
Cheers,
Rod
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
"Kevin Antel" <kevina@.cqlcorp.com> wrote in message
news:eJmDMgqIGHA.2628@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Yes, I get an error during validation. Yes, I am trying to use the same
> IP that I used with the team. I am in the middle of support right now,
> but as soon as I can get the error, I will throw it up here.
>
> "Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@.die.spam.die.nw-america.com> wrote in
> message news:%23uiXoaqIGHA.3020@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>
|||Nevermind, I got it, it had problems with an application I had installed, it
had nothing to do with the NIC.
"Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@.die.spam.die.nw-america.com> wrote in
message news:uPTK04qIGHA.2896@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Great, thanks. What driver? NIC model?
> Cheers,
> Rod
> MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
> http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
> http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
> http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
> "Kevin Antel" <kevina@.cqlcorp.com> wrote in message
> news:eJmDMgqIGHA.2628@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>

Removing a SQL cluster node

Could someone point me to some documentation on the best way to remove a
node from a SQL cluster.
It's a two node, two instance cluster, and I plan to rebuild one node, fail
to the rebuilt one, then rebuild the remaining node.
-Karl
From the BOL:
"In this scenario, failure is caused by hardware failure in Node 1 of a
two-node cluster. This hardware failure could be caused, for example, by the
failure of a small computer system interface (SCSI) card or the operating
system.
1.. After Node 1 fails, the Microsoft SQL Server 2000 failover cluster
fails over to Node 2.
2.. Run SQL Server Setup and remove Node 1. For more information, see How
to remove a failover clustered instance .
3.. Evict Node 1 from Microsoft Cluster Service (MSCS). To evict a node
from MSCS, from Node 2, right-click on the node to remove, and then click
Evict Node.
4.. Install new hardware to replace the failed hardware in Node 1.
5.. Install the operating system. For more information about which
operating system to install and specific instructions on how to do this, see
Before Installing Failover Clustering.
6.. Install MSCS and join the existing cluster. For more information, see
Before Installing Failover Clustering.
7.. Run the Setup program on Node 2 and add Node 1 back to the failover
cluster. For more information, see How to add nodes to an existing virtual
server (Setup). "
Tom
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA
SQL Server MVP
Columnist, SQL Server Professional
Toronto, ON Canada
www.pinpub.com
..
"Karl" <karl@.nospam.postalias> wrote in message
news:uzFVttDfFHA.3936@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
Could someone point me to some documentation on the best way to remove a
node from a SQL cluster.
It's a two node, two instance cluster, and I plan to rebuild one node, fail
to the rebuilt one, then rebuild the remaining node.
-Karl
|||In addition, you will need to re-run any Service Packs and HotFixes on the
new node to update the binaries. Read the README file included with the
service pack for detailed instructions on how to apply the SP to a newly
added cluster node.
Geoff N. Hiten
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Tom Moreau" <tom@.dont.spam.me.cips.ca> wrote in message
news:%23udWQyDfFHA.1412@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> From the BOL:
> "In this scenario, failure is caused by hardware failure in Node 1 of a
> two-node cluster. This hardware failure could be caused, for example, by
> the
> failure of a small computer system interface (SCSI) card or the operating
> system.
> 1.. After Node 1 fails, the Microsoft SQL Server 2000 failover cluster
> fails over to Node 2.
>
> 2.. Run SQL Server Setup and remove Node 1. For more information, see How
> to remove a failover clustered instance .
>
> 3.. Evict Node 1 from Microsoft Cluster Service (MSCS). To evict a node
> from MSCS, from Node 2, right-click on the node to remove, and then click
> Evict Node.
>
> 4.. Install new hardware to replace the failed hardware in Node 1.
>
> 5.. Install the operating system. For more information about which
> operating system to install and specific instructions on how to do this,
> see
> Before Installing Failover Clustering.
>
> 6.. Install MSCS and join the existing cluster. For more information, see
> Before Installing Failover Clustering.
>
> 7.. Run the Setup program on Node 2 and add Node 1 back to the failover
> cluster. For more information, see How to add nodes to an existing virtual
> server (Setup). "
> --
> Tom
> ----
> Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA
> SQL Server MVP
> Columnist, SQL Server Professional
> Toronto, ON Canada
> www.pinpub.com
> .
> "Karl" <karl@.nospam.postalias> wrote in message
> news:uzFVttDfFHA.3936@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Could someone point me to some documentation on the best way to remove a
> node from a SQL cluster.
> It's a two node, two instance cluster, and I plan to rebuild one node,
> fail
> to the rebuilt one, then rebuild the remaining node.
> -Karl
>
|||I'm unclear about step #2. Following the BOL topic "How to remove a failover
clustered instance" appears to lead me down the path of removing the
instance entirely from the virtual server. The virtual server/instance is
working fine on node 2. I'm afraid to proceed because the prompts appear to
indicate that I'd be uninstalling the entire instance from the virtual
server.
Is it possible that if a node fails, there is no need to run SQL setup? Just
to go remaining node's MSCS and evict the unresponsive node (regardless if
its still online or not), reinstall and rejoin MSCS?
"Tom Moreau" <tom@.dont.spam.me.cips.ca> wrote in message
news:%23udWQyDfFHA.1412@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> From the BOL:
> "In this scenario, failure is caused by hardware failure in Node 1 of a
> two-node cluster. This hardware failure could be caused, for example, by
> the
> failure of a small computer system interface (SCSI) card or the operating
> system.
> 1.. After Node 1 fails, the Microsoft SQL Server 2000 failover cluster
> fails over to Node 2.
>
> 2.. Run SQL Server Setup and remove Node 1. For more information, see How
> to remove a failover clustered instance .
>
> 3.. Evict Node 1 from Microsoft Cluster Service (MSCS). To evict a node
> from MSCS, from Node 2, right-click on the node to remove, and then click
> Evict Node.
>
> 4.. Install new hardware to replace the failed hardware in Node 1.
>
> 5.. Install the operating system. For more information about which
> operating system to install and specific instructions on how to do this,
> see
> Before Installing Failover Clustering.
>
> 6.. Install MSCS and join the existing cluster. For more information, see
> Before Installing Failover Clustering.
>
> 7.. Run the Setup program on Node 2 and add Node 1 back to the failover
> cluster. For more information, see How to add nodes to an existing virtual
> server (Setup). "
> --
> Tom
> ----
> Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA
> SQL Server MVP
> Columnist, SQL Server Professional
> Toronto, ON Canada
> www.pinpub.com
> .
> "Karl" <karl@.nospam.postalias> wrote in message
> news:uzFVttDfFHA.3936@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Could someone point me to some documentation on the best way to remove a
> node from a SQL cluster.
> It's a two node, two instance cluster, and I plan to rebuild one node,
> fail
> to the rebuilt one, then rebuild the remaining node.
> -Karl
>
|||Hi Karl,
In step#2 we should refer to the "How to remove a node from an existing
failover cluster" topic:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en...ering_7hyq.asp
It appears that "see How to remove a failover clustered instance" in the
"How to recover from failover cluster failure in Scenario 1" topic is
incorrect, I've sent a feedback to the appropriate team. The remain part is
correct and we need to follow every step.
Please let me know if you have any other questions.
Sincerely,
William Wang
Microsoft Online Partner Support
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
|||It does appear ambigious in the docs. When you remove SQL, you will remove
it from the dead node only. That will clean up the SQL clustering
information on the remaining node(s). Once the new or newly
rebuild/repaired node is rejoined to the cluster, you still have to install
SQL on it. This means installing local binaries and configuring the cluster
to recognize it as a possible host for the SQL resource group. That is what
the SQL installation steps do. It is not enough to just add the node to the
cluster.
Again, don't forget to apply any service packs or hotfixes after adding the
node back.
BUG: Correcting Mismatched Binaries on SQL Clustered Virtual Server
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;295589
I agree that the docs are incorrect in that they do not describe how to
remove a node from a SQL cluster without uninstalling the entire virtual
server . Since William already reported it, I will leave it alone.
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Karl" <karl@.nospam.postalias> wrote in message
news:eXQQcFAiFHA.1244@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> I'm unclear about step #2. Following the BOL topic "How to remove a
> failover clustered instance" appears to lead me down the path of removing
> the instance entirely from the virtual server. The virtual server/instance
> is working fine on node 2. I'm afraid to proceed because the prompts
> appear to indicate that I'd be uninstalling the entire instance from the
> virtual server.
> Is it possible that if a node fails, there is no need to run SQL setup?
> Just to go remaining node's MSCS and evict the unresponsive node
> (regardless if its still online or not), reinstall and rejoin MSCS?
> "Tom Moreau" <tom@.dont.spam.me.cips.ca> wrote in message
> news:%23udWQyDfFHA.1412@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>
|||Thanks to Geoff and William for pointing me to the right procedures. I've
rebuilt the node from scratch and have added it back to the cluster. I have
a question related to patching and mismatched binaries - and avoiding
reboots.
I want to apply SQL2000-KB815495-8.00.0818-ENU.exe hotfix to the new node
but I don't want to reboot the good/production node which is currently
hosting the instance.
I attempt to run the hotfix on the passive node but it says it has to run on
the active node. Attempting the install on the active node reports that it
will take the resource offline.
Is it possible to copy binaries into the passive node so as not to incur any
SQL downtime? So far the entire rebuild of this passive node has had no
effect on the active production instance. I'd hate to ruin the record this
late in the game!
-Karl
"Geoff N. Hiten" <sqlcraftsman@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:OV61RWHiFHA.1464@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
It does appear ambigious in the docs. When you remove SQL, you will remove
it from the dead node only. That will clean up the SQL clustering
information on the remaining node(s). Once the new or newly
rebuild/repaired node is rejoined to the cluster, you still have to install
SQL on it. This means installing local binaries and configuring the cluster
to recognize it as a possible host for the SQL resource group. That is what
the SQL installation steps do. It is not enough to just add the node to the
cluster.
Again, don't forget to apply any service packs or hotfixes after adding the
node back.
BUG: Correcting Mismatched Binaries on SQL Clustered Virtual Server
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;295589
I agree that the docs are incorrect in that they do not describe how to
remove a node from a SQL cluster without uninstalling the entire virtual
server . Since William already reported it, I will leave it alone.
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Karl" <karl@.nospam.postalias> wrote in message
news:eXQQcFAiFHA.1244@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> I'm unclear about step #2. Following the BOL topic "How to remove a
> failover clustered instance" appears to lead me down the path of removing
> the instance entirely from the virtual server. The virtual server/instance
> is working fine on node 2. I'm afraid to proceed because the prompts
> appear to indicate that I'd be uninstalling the entire instance from the
> virtual server.
> Is it possible that if a node fails, there is no need to run SQL setup?
> Just to go remaining node's MSCS and evict the unresponsive node
> (regardless if its still online or not), reinstall and rejoin MSCS?
> "Tom Moreau" <tom@.dont.spam.me.cips.ca> wrote in message
> news:%23udWQyDfFHA.1412@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>
|||The old installer sometimes let you do a "binary-only upgrade" to a node
that is not currently hosting the target SQL instance. That has caused
issues in the past and was removed at build 977 when the new hotfix
installer debuted. A hotfix typically takes about 5-10 minutes to run and
yes, the instance does have to go offline.
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Karl" <karl@.nospam.postalias> wrote in message
news:udt6OmYrFHA.3788@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Thanks to Geoff and William for pointing me to the right procedures. I've
> rebuilt the node from scratch and have added it back to the cluster. I
> have
> a question related to patching and mismatched binaries - and avoiding
> reboots.
> I want to apply SQL2000-KB815495-8.00.0818-ENU.exe hotfix to the new node
> but I don't want to reboot the good/production node which is currently
> hosting the instance.
> I attempt to run the hotfix on the passive node but it says it has to run
> on
> the active node. Attempting the install on the active node reports that it
> will take the resource offline.
> Is it possible to copy binaries into the passive node so as not to incur
> any
> SQL downtime? So far the entire rebuild of this passive node has had no
> effect on the active production instance. I'd hate to ruin the record this
> late in the game!
> -Karl
>
> "Geoff N. Hiten" <sqlcraftsman@.gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:OV61RWHiFHA.1464@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> It does appear ambigious in the docs. When you remove SQL, you will
> remove
> it from the dead node only. That will clean up the SQL clustering
> information on the remaining node(s). Once the new or newly
> rebuild/repaired node is rejoined to the cluster, you still have to
> install
> SQL on it. This means installing local binaries and configuring the
> cluster
> to recognize it as a possible host for the SQL resource group. That is
> what
> the SQL installation steps do. It is not enough to just add the node to
> the
> cluster.
> Again, don't forget to apply any service packs or hotfixes after adding
> the
> node back.
> BUG: Correcting Mismatched Binaries on SQL Clustered Virtual Server
> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;295589
> I agree that the docs are incorrect in that they do not describe how to
> remove a node from a SQL cluster without uninstalling the entire virtual
> server . Since William already reported it, I will leave it alone.
> Geoff N. Hiten
> Senior Database Administrator
> Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> "Karl" <karl@.nospam.postalias> wrote in message
> news:eXQQcFAiFHA.1244@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>
>
|||To clarify, when adding a node to an existing virtual server, the SQL
Instance will come OffLine for about 5-10 minutes while the binaries are
written? Thanks for the input as we may be replacing a node as well.
John
Geoff N. Hiten wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
>The old installer sometimes let you do a "binary-only upgrade" to a node
>that is not currently hosting the target SQL instance. That has caused
>issues in the past and was removed at build 977 when the new hotfix
>installer debuted. A hotfix typically takes about 5-10 minutes to run and
>yes, the instance does have to go offline.
>[quoted text clipped - 106 lines]
|||Yes. The hotfix will be applied to all nodes and any update scripts will
get re-run. The instance may stop and start several times in single-user
mode to apply updates. I have found that if you have a very large memory
system (16GB or more), it speeds things up considerably to lower the memory
settings before applying the hotfix and increase them after it has
completed.
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"John via droptable.com" <forum@.droptable.com> wrote in message
news:53AB45D140ED3@.droptable.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> To clarify, when adding a node to an existing virtual server, the SQL
> Instance will come OffLine for about 5-10 minutes while the binaries are
> written? Thanks for the input as we may be replacing a node as well.
> John
> Geoff N. Hiten wrote: