Removing Domain Controller status from a SQL server

Aloha -
I have a sick server (HOKU) which doubles as a domain controller and a SQL
server. The plan is to move SQL to a new server (SQL1), demote HOKU to a
member server, remove it from the domain then do away with it.
The plan is to demote it this weekend. Then in a couple weeks move the SQL
once testing is done. Is there danger in "de-domain controlering" a SQL
server that is used to being on a DC? At this point I know enough to know
that we're making a fairly major change, but I don't know enough to know
exactly what I am nervous about.Hi
From a SQL Server point of view, I don't see any problems in demoting a SQL
server. SQL server don't use anything from the Domain Controller as such, so
as long as you have your domain fully functional there shouldn't be any
problems.
Depending on how your users connect to the databases, there might be some
fiddling around when you move the SQL server, since you most likely will
change the server name and/or IP adress.
Regards
Steen
Kahonu wrote:
> Aloha -
> I have a sick server (HOKU) which doubles as a domain controller and
> a SQL server. The plan is to move SQL to a new server (SQL1), demote
> HOKU to a member server, remove it from the domain then do away with
> it.
> The plan is to demote it this weekend. Then in a couple weeks move
> the SQL once testing is done. Is there danger in "de-domain
> controlering" a SQL server that is used to being on a DC? At this
> point I know enough to know that we're making a fairly major change,
> but I don't know enough to know exactly what I am nervous about.|||Kahonu wrote on Wed, 1 Jun 2005 19:03:18 -0700:
> Aloha -
> I have a sick server (HOKU) which doubles as a domain controller and a SQL
> server. The plan is to move SQL to a new server (SQL1), demote HOKU to a
> member server, remove it from the domain then do away with it.
> The plan is to demote it this weekend. Then in a couple weeks move the SQL
> once testing is done. Is there danger in "de-domain controlering" a SQL
> server that is used to being on a DC? At this point I know enough to know
> that we're making a fairly major change, but I don't know enough to know
> exactly what I am nervous about.
I demoted a W2K Server to a member server with SQL Server 2000 just 2 weeks
ago, no ill effects as yet. I needed to rename the server prior to running
in production, and I'd be running it as a domain controller while migrating
from NT4 to 2K. The demotion was painless, it was the renaming that was the
fun part :\
Dan|||I have also demoted as you are doing, and like the others had no problems...
In fact, it is a bad practice to put SQL on a domain controller anyway - so
you are doing a good thing and improving security by your actions as well.
--
Wayne Snyder MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
(Please respond only to the newsgroup.)
I support the Professional Association for SQL Server ( PASS) and it's
community of SQL Professionals.
"Kahonu" <Kahonu@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FE165EC2-B09B-4D40-9782-D8C54CB036C7@.microsoft.com...
> Aloha -
> I have a sick server (HOKU) which doubles as a domain controller and a SQL
> server. The plan is to move SQL to a new server (SQL1), demote HOKU to a
> member server, remove it from the domain then do away with it.
> The plan is to demote it this weekend. Then in a couple weeks move the SQL
> once testing is done. Is there danger in "de-domain controlering" a SQL
> server that is used to being on a DC? At this point I know enough to know
> that we're making a fairly major change, but I don't know enough to know
> exactly what I am nervous about.
>